On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:45:54 -0700 Michael Jennings <m...@kainx.org> said:
> On Friday, 30 July 2010, at 08:22:25 (+0900), > Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > then you wrap at 85.. then you say "but if we made it a little wider > > it'd be nicer" so it become 90, then "if its a bit wider" 95.. and > > so on. it doesn't end until you cease wrapping entirely. i think > > trying to stick to 80 wide is good. it's the standard term > > width. it's not a magic number invented for efl coding. uncrustify > > needs to be able to handle the above case properly. the only > > question is... how to do it? > > I've mentioned this before, but I'll do so again. Most terminals have > the ability to toggle between 80-column and 132-column mode via a menu > option or escape sequence. I set all my emacs windows to be 132 > columns wide for this reason, and wrap my source at 132 columns > instead of 80. The result is significantly more readable. > > xterm and Eterm both support it. You can do it manually using: > echo -e "\e[?40;3h" > or (in Eterm) bind it to a menu item. To toggle back, change the 'h' > to an 'l' (that's a lowercase L). yes.. and if i maximize my terms i get 383x101... if i made my fonts smaller and got some 30" screens i'd get more. moot point. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
