On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:56:03 -0400 Christopher Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 01:49 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > If I remember correctly there are some edj (i.e already compiled > > edc's) in svn. > > Don't forget to update them, or better yet, create a Makefile for > > them and start shipping only edc's. > > > That would be the preferred way (edc), so that future things like > that do not require too much manual updating...the edj files can just > be remade during the build process. I have always insisted that we store edc source files in SVN and not edj files. This is yet one more good reason to. Raster said that edj is an image format like PNG, but PNG is not compiled from source, so that argument is not a good one. edj files are compiled from source, so we should ALWAYS put the source in SVN and suitable makefiles to compile them. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
