On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 21:56 +0800, Tom Haste wrote:
> I figured Id throw my $0.00002 AUD into this...
> 
> Being a noob to the programming game, Just the ecore_init() seems fine
> by me as long as ecore_init() documentation also states that
> eina_init() happens with it. Seeing eina_init() and ecore_init() tells
> my noobie brain that one must happen before the other otherwise stuff
> might not work right.

I already commented on that, docs aren't everything.
Let's assume for a moment ecore does not want to use Eina anymore (but
keeps API the same), eina_init() is dropped from ecore_init() (because
it's not used) and the docs are updated to state that eina_init() is no
longer automatically issued.

In this scenario, an application with an explicit eina_init() will
continue to work just as well, while an application without the explicit
eina_init() will not. Both were written before the change in ecore, and
both read in the docs that eina_init() *is* automatically issued.

Do you get my point now?

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to