On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:08:52 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > > because i dont want to turn it on until 1.1. i want to keep the current alloc > scheme precisely as-is for now. no no mp created, no counting of items or > anything else. the macros reduce to exactly the current code as it stands > right > now.
Yes, I understand that. However passthrough is exactly that with the exception the functions get called, so the binary result is not the same, but the behavior is (passthrough shouldn't do anything such as "counting of items or anything else") But yeah, you're working around an SVN workflow problem with that. In an ideal world you'd be working on some branch that would be merged into trunk as soon as it's open for features... which is possible with SVN, but a major PITA. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
