On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:56:28 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:08:52 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > > > > because i dont want to turn it on until 1.1. i want to keep the current > > alloc scheme precisely as-is for now. no no mp created, no counting of > > items or anything else. the macros reduce to exactly the current code as it > > stands right now. > > Yes, I understand that. However passthrough is exactly that with the > exception the functions get called, so the binary result is not the > same, but the behavior is (passthrough shouldn't do anything such as > "counting of items or anything else") > > But yeah, you're working around an SVN workflow problem with that. In > an ideal world you'd be working on some branch that would be merged > into trunk as soon as it's open for features... which is possible with > SVN, but a major PITA. an ifdef is less work than pretty much any branching and merging :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
