On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Atton Jonathan <jonathan.at...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I am not a expert, maybe I have wrong .. > > > - installing dbus on windows seems to be hard and a lot of dbus daemon > doesn't work on windows. Consequently dbus is a bit useless on windows > > Do you have concrete data about it? AFAIK KDE maintains it and they even pushed for the new "systray" replacement using DBus instead of X11 messages because of that. This looks like FUD on your side. > > - some simple software/environnement does not have X ... and dbus. > > I think azy is very simple to install because it have very few (none > ?) dependencies outside EFL. > Again, another FUD. DBus is simple, very simple. It doesn't even depend on EFL, it's even lighter on dependencies. It's broadly used, packaged and supported. It's not related to X11, it's not tied to Glib, it's not stuck with Linux. People like to hate dbus without actual technical background to do so and that makes me sad. Being part of systemd project, which also happen to use DBus, but at a much lower level component, I also read people complaining about it without proper knowledge of their reasons... it's a bad thing. Let's keep the NIH syndrome out of EFL, we managed to do well for a while, but things are changing recently... what we'll end like? Another GNOME? :-D -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
