2011/11/14 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com>: > On 14/11/11 16:46, ChunEon Park wrote: >> >> IMHO, if it allows the editing then no need 'const' anymore. > > Yeah, that's my problem, and why I sent this email... I'm not sure how > to make an extra warning, as people don't always read the docs (usually > don't). >> >> Even I don't know about entry much better than u, >> Still I'm wondering the return of the textblok is reasonable... > > I was wondering the same for quite some time. A while a go I came to the > conclusion it's too tedious to do it any other way. I consulted with > raster, and he agreed. There are just too many low-level functions that > are needed and it's not reasonable to float them all the way from > textblock through edje and elm just to expose them to the user. >
Returning a textblock means you are returning the internal textblock from the internal edje of the entry? > -- > Tom. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
