On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: >> We should probably focus some efforts on rewriting/upgrading it, and then >> bump >> the .so version and do a 2.0 release for just e_dbus. > > better writing an ebus lib like raster told me, not using dbus but our own > implementation. It seems (i'm not an expert, Gustavo told me that iirc) > that using dbus means translating back and forth messages which is > useless. Also, using eet would be better.
I think you are talking about not using libdbus, right? Or you are suffering the NIH syndrome trying to invent your own bus? Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
