On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:01:27 +0200 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/12 14:56, David Seikel wrote: > > In the case of y1, the difference between a function and a variable > > will be noticed by the compiler. It will complain anyway. Without > > actually looking things up, I suspect the same will apply to index. > > > > True, but that's not the point. The point is that -Wshadow is useful, > even very useful, but having efl compile with a ton of warnings will > make a mess and hide all the other useful warnings. This means that > we need to fix all the shadow warnings in all of EFL, even the stupid > ones. I wonder what other ultra paranoid warnings we will have to "fix" in the future? Is there a -Wyou-spelled-edge-wrong-you-dimwit in gcc? > > Hmm, just noticed that with -Wshadow, ALL of EFL was failing to > > compile. So I've removed it again. > > Those are just warnings,as long as you don't have -Werror set, you > should be fine... Actually it was failing at the autogen stage every time. I don't have -Werror turned on. I just started getting other mysterious errors to. Something wonky going on right now. I really did not want to update my SVN right now anyway. I just needed to in order to revert your commit. sigh -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
