On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:35:23 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa <rak...@freebsd.org> said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> writes: > > > beyond using TMPDIR, TMP and TEMP env vars... i dont see how this > > helps much :) in fact they probably should be there in if (fd < 0). on > > non-linux it STAR TS with fd being -1 so it goes right it the failure > > case. for linx this means failure case still works. we.l that and the > > ifdef around the unlink. > > > > i've put in an alternate patch in svn that keeps the tmpdir fallback > > for evas. > > The reason I stopped treating the failure case on Linux is that when we > discussed the patch on IRC you said we shouldn't take the case of > /dev/shm not being present into account. Anyway, glad to see that this > has finally been fixed. well /dev/shm not being there is going to be a REALLy rare day in hell, and with cserve blah blah blah - we kind of cant work without it anymore. :) but the code is easier and cleaner to read imho if we keep the failure case for linux anyway. > Should this be backported, as currently no stable release has that > function working on non-Linux platforms? Do I need to write > NEWS/ChangeLog items? good question. i suppose it should be backported. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
