On 11 July 2012 13:56, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote: > beside the fact that you didn't add @since in the doc, that you didn't > update ChangeLog and NEWS, a quaternion can represent a rotation in a > 3D vector space if it is a unit quaternion. It's not mentioned in the > doc, nor tested in the code. Is it normal ?
Well it's just that I didn't think about it. We can put it in the doc like you said, or we can normalize the quaternion in the function. Which way is preferable? Sorry about the other changes I had to do. I just checked this link from the contribute page: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/PatchReview -- http://indefini.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
