On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves
> <gl...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> > * Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> [2012-10-31 11:38:52 +0900]:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr>
> wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Christophe Dumez
> >> >> <christophe.du...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> There are lots of concerns from EFL developers (me included) on how
> >> >>>> the development of WebKit-EFL is being done. The API of webkit2
> even
> >> >>>> not being fully supported by EFL, as contrary to webkit1. There's
> only
> >> >>>> 1 developer that seemed to care and started to send patches to
> >> >>>> elm-web, so webkit2 can be fully supported.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> No surprise there was feedback asking for clarifications and why a
> >> >>>> simpler api couldn't be used. Now you come and say WebKit1 is being
> >> >>>> deprecated.  -1000 here, until the day webkit2 gets fully
> supported in
> >> >>>> EFL and you start to interact more with EFL devs.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The proposed date for dropping WK1 EFL from upstream is 8 month
> away. I think this
> >> >>> gives a reasonable amount of time for people currently relying on
> WK1 EFL to port their code to WK2 EFL.
> >> >>> If anything, this should motivate people to make sure all the
> components work with WK2 EFL.
> >> >>
> >> >> 8 months is clearly to short from now is clearly to short. 8 months
> >> >> after WK2 EFL API is stabilized and "released" (I mean by that, that
> >> >> any API/ABI break of it will be forbidden). Then you can consider
> >> >> dropping WK1 EFL. Announcing that you will drop WK1 EFL when WK2 EFL
> >> >> is not even stable, is not a proper move in my opinion.
> >> >>
> >> >> Upstream EFL does use WK1 EFL in the 1.7.x branch, that will be used
> >> >> by E17 release later this year. This means that all distribution that
> >> >> do want to package EFL with a stable release for E17 will be
> depending
> >> >> on WK1 EFL. You can stop development, only do bugfixes, but removing
> >> >> it is clearly not a smart move here.
> >> >>
> >> >>> About interaction with EFL developers, I don't think we have any
> problem answering questions related
> >> >>> to WebKit EFL (via this mailing list or the IRC channel) or fix
> bugs filed upstream against WebKit EFL.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, you have. I am aware of the move to WK2 EFL since less than 3
> >> >> weeks. If some nice Samsung guy didn't try to help EFL upstream to
> >> >> move away of WK1 EFL we wouldn't be even have any proper information
> >> >> and code here. At this point, the WebKit EFL people need to get more
> >> >> involved with EFL. It's not a matter of answering question, it's
> about
> >> >> using the same tool and do that efficiently ! If we don't share
> >> >> infromation more effectively, this kind of thread is going to repeat.
> >> >> I strongly encourage every developer of WK EFL to join e-devel
> mailing
> >> >> list and ping people there when there is important subject to bring
> in
> >> >> (like new dependencies, feature request, ...). I am now subscribed to
> >> >> this mailing list and will try to keep reading it, but that's not
> >> >> enough. WK EFL team should get more engadged with EFL developer in
> >> >> general.
> >> >
> >> > As a related note: although Ecore provides curl/http, WebKit still
> >> > uses the crap alien that is libsoup. Why not start the Webkit + EFL
> >> > adding the missing bits to Ecore_Con and then using it natively in
> >> > WebKit, instead of forcing glib-mainloop integration for nothing?
> >>
> >> I can't but only agree and wish for that to happen soon.
> >
> > +1 here. Then it would be just cairo on the gtk land, I guess.
>
> what about using enesim instead of cairo ? The rendering of esvg is
> faster than with librsvg, and is much more powerful, and it is not
> optimized, so plenty of room for improvements
>
> Vincent
>

I cast two votes in favor of this.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to