On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves > <gl...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > > * Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> [2012-10-31 11:38:52 +0900]: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> > wrote: > >> >> Hello, > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Christophe Dumez > >> >> <christophe.du...@intel.com> wrote: > >> >>>> There are lots of concerns from EFL developers (me included) on how > >> >>>> the development of WebKit-EFL is being done. The API of webkit2 > even > >> >>>> not being fully supported by EFL, as contrary to webkit1. There's > only > >> >>>> 1 developer that seemed to care and started to send patches to > >> >>>> elm-web, so webkit2 can be fully supported. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> No surprise there was feedback asking for clarifications and why a > >> >>>> simpler api couldn't be used. Now you come and say WebKit1 is being > >> >>>> deprecated. -1000 here, until the day webkit2 gets fully > supported in > >> >>>> EFL and you start to interact more with EFL devs. > >> >>> > >> >>> The proposed date for dropping WK1 EFL from upstream is 8 month > away. I think this > >> >>> gives a reasonable amount of time for people currently relying on > WK1 EFL to port their code to WK2 EFL. > >> >>> If anything, this should motivate people to make sure all the > components work with WK2 EFL. > >> >> > >> >> 8 months is clearly to short from now is clearly to short. 8 months > >> >> after WK2 EFL API is stabilized and "released" (I mean by that, that > >> >> any API/ABI break of it will be forbidden). Then you can consider > >> >> dropping WK1 EFL. Announcing that you will drop WK1 EFL when WK2 EFL > >> >> is not even stable, is not a proper move in my opinion. > >> >> > >> >> Upstream EFL does use WK1 EFL in the 1.7.x branch, that will be used > >> >> by E17 release later this year. This means that all distribution that > >> >> do want to package EFL with a stable release for E17 will be > depending > >> >> on WK1 EFL. You can stop development, only do bugfixes, but removing > >> >> it is clearly not a smart move here. > >> >> > >> >>> About interaction with EFL developers, I don't think we have any > problem answering questions related > >> >>> to WebKit EFL (via this mailing list or the IRC channel) or fix > bugs filed upstream against WebKit EFL. > >> >> > >> >> Yes, you have. I am aware of the move to WK2 EFL since less than 3 > >> >> weeks. If some nice Samsung guy didn't try to help EFL upstream to > >> >> move away of WK1 EFL we wouldn't be even have any proper information > >> >> and code here. At this point, the WebKit EFL people need to get more > >> >> involved with EFL. It's not a matter of answering question, it's > about > >> >> using the same tool and do that efficiently ! If we don't share > >> >> infromation more effectively, this kind of thread is going to repeat. > >> >> I strongly encourage every developer of WK EFL to join e-devel > mailing > >> >> list and ping people there when there is important subject to bring > in > >> >> (like new dependencies, feature request, ...). I am now subscribed to > >> >> this mailing list and will try to keep reading it, but that's not > >> >> enough. WK EFL team should get more engadged with EFL developer in > >> >> general. > >> > > >> > As a related note: although Ecore provides curl/http, WebKit still > >> > uses the crap alien that is libsoup. Why not start the Webkit + EFL > >> > adding the missing bits to Ecore_Con and then using it natively in > >> > WebKit, instead of forcing glib-mainloop integration for nothing? > >> > >> I can't but only agree and wish for that to happen soon. > > > > +1 here. Then it would be just cairo on the gtk land, I guess. > > what about using enesim instead of cairo ? The rendering of esvg is > faster than with librsvg, and is much more powerful, and it is not > optimized, so plenty of room for improvements > > Vincent > I cast two votes in favor of this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel