On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de >> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it >> > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for >> > 12 years without being implemented. >> >> First of all, shm_open is an optional part of POSIX. One of the reasons >> for reluctantly implementing it is that it is extremely lame. The way >> Linux implements it provides ~0 advantage of just using open() with a >> file in /tmp. >> > > Not in our point of view. Anyway, you're free to add an eina wrapper that > does use a file in /tmp for BSD. We're not just doing that for Linux as > there is better way of doing it (that at guarantees it's never going to > disk). >
read carefully : http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/functions/shm_open.html Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
