On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:10:31 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:49:58 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> > said: > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:03:35 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:50:08 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, David Seikel wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" > > > > > <no-re...@enlightenment.org <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > add missing licenses references, fix copyright, add link > > > > > > result notice. > > > > > > > > > > > > Author: barbieri > > > > > > Date: 2013-01-16 13:48:14 -0800 (Wed, 16 Jan 2013) > > > > > > New Revision: 82911 > > > > > > Trac: > > > > > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/82911 > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > > trunk/efl/COPYING trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified: trunk/efl/COPYING > > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > > --- trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:47:37 UTC (rev 82910) > > > > > > +++ trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:48:14 UTC (rev 82911) > > > > > > @@ -1,11 +1,23 @@ > > > > > > -EFL comes with several licences. Listed are the > > > > > > library/probject +EFL comes with several licences. Listed > > > > > > are the library/project name and the license file covering > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > evil: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > -escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL > > > > > > +escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL (used in PlayStation > > > > > > native) +eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > eet: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > -eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > eo: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > evas: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL > > > > > > ecore: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > -embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL > > > > > > +eio: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > +edbus: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > +efreet: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +eeze: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +ephysics: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +edje: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +edje/epp: licenses/COPYING.GPL (separate > > > > > > binary/executable) +emotion: licenses/COPYING.BSD > > > > > > +ethumb: licenses/COPYING.LGPL > > > > > > + > > > > > > +NOTE: If linked together, the result will be LGPL (or GPL > > > > > > is Escape is +used) due that license characteristics. > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm, guess that means the BSD licences are useless, since > > > > > it's all gonna be linked together anyway, and thus GPL > > > > > contaminated. > > > > > > > > > > > > That is right. For all purposes consider EFL = LGPL. We just > > > > didn't change the license as it would require approvals. But > > > > effectively it's all LGPL. > > > > > > incorrect. only if we make a single libefl.so is this the case. > > > > IANAL, and I don't think most of us are either, but this is a legal > > matter that might eventually get tested in courts. Now while it's > > true that all manner of bizarre things have been decided in courts, > > I suspect that the viral nature of GPL and variants might be tossed > > out as it tries to undermine the copy rights of others. Basically > > it tries to impose copying restrictions on third parties > > copyrighted intellectual property that the owner of said copyright > > material may not wish to impose. > > > > As such, I'll state that all my contributions to the projects > > generally known as Enlightenment Foundation Libraries and > > Enlightenment DR17 where made under the BSD licence that applies to > > most of it. It was my intention to have my contributions be > > licensed under that BSD licence. Anybody wishing to place > > restrictions outside of that BSD licence on my copyrighted > > contributions best get a lawyer. > > > > Yes I know, this is all silly, but people do take this shit > > seriously. Just ask Google. B-) > > lgpl is very explicit that its boundaries are at the boundary of the > shared library - as long as the library is a separate one (with some > little gotchas which don't apply to us here), it doesnt cross it. gpl > is a different matter. Ah, but we are merging now. The boundaries are a bit fluid as code shifts between the libraries, which is why we merged in the first place. Something that we should be careful about. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
