On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:50:08 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, David Seikel wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" >> > <no-re...@enlightenment.org <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > > Log: >> > > add missing licenses references, fix copyright, add link result >> > > notice. >> > > >> > > Author: barbieri >> > > Date: 2013-01-16 13:48:14 -0800 (Wed, 16 Jan 2013) >> > > New Revision: 82911 >> > > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/82911 >> > > >> > > Modified: >> > > trunk/efl/COPYING trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > trunk/efl/licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > >> > > Modified: trunk/efl/COPYING >> > > =================================================================== >> > > --- trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:47:37 UTC (rev 82910) >> > > +++ trunk/efl/COPYING 2013-01-16 21:48:14 UTC (rev 82911) >> > > @@ -1,11 +1,23 @@ >> > > -EFL comes with several licences. Listed are the library/probject >> > > +EFL comes with several licences. Listed are the library/project >> > > name and the license file covering it. >> > > >> > > evil: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > -escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL >> > > +escape: licenses/COPYING.GPL (used in PlayStation native) >> > > +eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > eet: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > -eina: licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > eo: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > evas: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL >> > > ecore: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > -embryo: licenses/COPYING.SMALL >> > > +eio: licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > +edbus: licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > +efreet: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +eeze: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +ephysics: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +edje: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +edje/epp: licenses/COPYING.GPL (separate binary/executable) >> > > +emotion: licenses/COPYING.BSD >> > > +ethumb: licenses/COPYING.LGPL >> > > + >> > > +NOTE: If linked together, the result will be LGPL (or GPL is Escape >> > > is +used) due that license characteristics. >> > >> > Hmmm, guess that means the BSD licences are useless, since it's all >> > gonna be linked together anyway, and thus GPL contaminated. >> >> >> That is right. For all purposes consider EFL = LGPL. We just didn't change >> the license as it would require approvals. But effectively it's all LGPL. > > incorrect. only if we make a single libefl.so is this the case.
The on-disk .so files are not, but as soon as they are dynamically linked in the application they do that. Unfortunately I had to learn that with some lawyers :-P -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
