On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:04:27 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:20:03 -0200 "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" > <ebl...@gmail.com> said: > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:16:33 +0900 Cedric BAIL > > > <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: > > > > > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Jérémy Zurcher > > >> <jer...@asynk.ch> wrote: > > >> > On Monday 28 January 2013 12:44, Alex-P. Natsios wrote : > > >> >> Now that i opened it again it opened relatively faster but in > > >> >> an editor thingy last time i tried (yesterday) it took quite > > >> >> a time for most of the Code Browser interface. > > >> >> Commit history listing, opening a file, navigating in code.. > > >> >> all took a few seconds and were barely rendering line by line > > >> >> here. > > >> >> > > >> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Martin Jansa > > >> >> <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:04:35AM +0100, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Alex-P. Natsios > > >> >> >> <apnats...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> > My register issue with the captcha has disappeared and i > > >> >> >> > finally was able to make an account. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I still had to edit local source of registration form and > > >> >> > replace http:// with https:// in recaptcha URL. > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> > The UI is pretty nice but can be confusing , same goes > > >> >> >> > for some linguistic choices for most terms (as also > > >> >> >> > stated by David Seikel and Davide Andreoli). > > >> >> >> > As stated by Jérémy Zurcher in another thread the code > > >> >> >> > browser is REALLY slow (damn.. sorry for arguing with > > >> >> >> > you .. haven't tested it.. its slower than acceptable > > >> >> >> > O.o). > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Uh ? I am not sure we are testing the same website ! The > > >> >> >> code browser is infinitely faster than what we have now > > >> >> >> and seems to give almost instant access. Maybe it is due > > >> >> >> to some network lag ? Where are you and what do you mean > > >> >> >> by really slow ? How long does it take for you to navigate > > >> >> >> to master efl/src/lib/eina/eina_file.c ? It took me 18s > > >> >> >> from the "Browse Repositories" and I feel like the > > >> >> >> bottleneck is my ability to click the link quickly. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Here it was also relatively quick. > > >> >> > 2 minutes to find "Browser Repositories" :) > > >> >> > and then 12s to naviage to efl/src/lib/eina/eina_file.c. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Cheers, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > -- > > >> >> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Regards, > > >> >> > > >> >> Alex-P. Natsios > > >> >> (a.k.a Drakevr) > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > compare these 2.com, and navigate > > >> > > > >> > http://cgit.asynk.ch/e/tree/efl/src/lib/eina/eina_file.c > > >> > https://phab.enlightenment.org/diffusion/EFL/browse/master/src/lib/eina/eina_file.c > > >> > > >> It took me 15s to go to eina_file.c instead of 18s. > > >> > > >> > speed, signal/noise ratio, syntax coloration, diff options, > > >> > easy access to branches ... only git blame output is missing > > >> > from cgit. > > >> > > >> syntax coloration is indeed something clearly missing from phab. > > >> > > >> > cgit.enlightenment.org is a really cheap and nice > > >> > complementary tool to have, usable by non-registred users too. > > >> > > >> Is it worth maintaining it ? That's our question, at the moment, > > >> it's a 3s and syntax coloration win from my point of view. Is > > >> that enough ? > > > > > > i say that its not worth it imho... one reason for choosing phab > > > is that fact that we can sanely maintain it if need be... it's in > > > php. most devs know php, and if they don't.. they are not writing > > > c :) > > > > > > Wait, does it means that I know PHP!? It's like the Matrix "I know > > kung-fu" then. \o/ > > it is... :) tho tbh.. php is just C with $in front of variables.. and > no types... :) its that simple.. sou know it by "implication" of > knowing c. :) thus... "you know king-fu" :) Well, it's a C like language, there's lots of those. The big differences are in the libraries though, but at least C coders will be familiar with the syntax. Mostly. On the other hand, you don't usually embed C source code inside HTML and expect it to work. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
