I know that it's a feature addition, but considering that it's to enable better testing of the 1.7.x branch, I would let it go in.
Does anyone have something against it? On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Eoff, Ullysses A <ullysses.a.e...@intel.com> wrote: > I wanted to ask if anyone has reservations about backporting the following > patches to the ecore-1.7 tree: > > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=c36058806a302e7919087b05a8513d44c14db4f0 > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=a2197ce5035dbbde52978bcb7cd44be26962cc34 > > > > These commits are additions to the Ecore_Wayland API mainly to support the > ability to write better EFL/Wayland client test programs that can connect to > a wayland test extension for more robust and aggressive testing (e.g. input > emulation, low-level event testing, and client<->server validation). > Without these commits, the EFL/Wayland testing capabilities are much less > than desirable. I have been using these features on EFL master since they > were added there about a month ago and have not encountered any bugs and > have seen a very large increase in EFL/Wayland code execution coverage from > the new tests that we’ve been able to develop with these features. > Unfortunately, we can’t run the new tests on an efl 1.7 S/W stack without > the aforementioned commits. > > > > Comments? > > > > U. Artie Eoff > > Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -- Rafael Antognolli http://antognolli.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
