On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz > <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point >> considering the amount of rewrite occurring. > > There is still no agreement about if we are going to change any of the > existing API or not. It is still a discussion. And the change is going > to impact mostly EFL internal than an application using EFL.
Humn... even then I'd say it would be better to do one of the below: 1) Keep it private and link statically to Eo. This has the downside that now every lib has to link statically and grows (side note.. is there any plans for libelf.so?) 2) Remove the versioning from libeo.so so we can do a proper release later without bumping the major (which would look odd compared to the other libs) Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
