On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Cedric Bail - Enlightenment Git > > <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > >> cedric pushed a commit to branch master. > >> > >> commit cd77853222d1c11d71da4ca9066abe35390dcd5e > >> Author: Cedric Bail <cedric.b...@samsung.com> > >> Date: Wed Sep 11 16:08:06 2013 +0900 > >> > >> eo: add eo_childrens_iterator_new(). > >> > >> The goal would be to replace the smart children list and friends. The > >> problem is that they differ in content. Smart children and Eo children > >> are > >> the same, but Elm children and them differ. If I put this function as a > >> virtual, it would be possible to override the list of children and if > >> we > >> start using it in Evas render loop, that could result in "weird" > >> behavior. > > > > 1st, as glima pointed out children is already plural form, no need for > > trailing "s" > > Fix, thanks. > > > 2nd, I think this may cause a confusion. If one want all the Eo whose > > eo_parent_get() is X, they may want to call > > eo_children_iterator_new(X), but this virtual may not return that > > exact list, but a subset. I don't remember exactly about the Elm case, > > but I recall we had cases where one object is bound to another without > > being member_add(), in that case eo_children_iterator_new() would > > return objects that eo_parent_get(child) != X. > > Yes, you see my problem. So for the moment it is not a virtual > function. The think is that right now we do have many children list: > one in Eo, one in Evas smart object, one in Evas Box object, one in > Evas Table object and one in Elm object(Actually Edje also has one, > but a little bit different). Now I am trying to find where they do > match and it is clearly not obvious :-(
:-( > > I see what you're trying to do, but I don't know if the naming is correct. > > Open to better idea here. Also I have been looking at adding events on > child ADD and DEL, but it is going to be complex. As the children are > part of eo.c and not of the base class, I can't be sure that it is > actually an object that have an event infrastructure. There is I think > two possibility. > > - Make eo.c check the type of the object and dispatch an event if it > is an object inherited from eo base class. > - Move the parent code handling into eo base class. > > Any though on that subject also ? move to base class -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri -------------------------------------- Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 Contact: http://www.gustavobarbieri.com.br/contact ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
