On 01/10/13 11:38, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > is this a joke? I'm giving him access to work on E, which he HAS been doing > publicly for months. He's been mentioned on the release blog and his > commits are easy enough to find; given that I'm the (only) maintainer for > the project, that's more than enough justification. I guess I could discuss > it with the rest of the developers/maintainers of the project a bit longer, > but I do enough talking to myself as it is. > > Don't throw a tantrum just because you got screwed by security today.
That's not how we work and you know it. Chris is the maintainer of that made up library he's working on, and yet, we didn't give access to his progeny. This is complete bullshit. Also, yeah, he's been fixing bugs in E for months, with a total of 4 commits. Yes, you can discuss it with the rest of the developers, for example, everyone mentioned in the "about" dialog would be a start. I didn't get screwed by security today, I got to play Super Mario for 1.5 hours today, if anything I should be thanking them. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
