Hello,

Currently, writing modules for enlightenment using C++ is not possible
without modifying headers from enlightenment.

How is the policy for these headers w.r.t C++ compatibility?

The most common problems are:
* Lack of extern "C";
* The use of C++ keywords, e.g., class (replaced for klass);
* Functions and macros defined in the header with implicit conversion
from unrelated pointer types;
* Typedefs before definition or declaration of the typedef'ed UDT.

Regards,
-- 
Felipe Magno de Almeida

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to