On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:22:08 -0200 "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" <ebl...@gmail.com>
said:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Jeff Hoogland schrieb:
> > > Can I make a request that once the 1.9.x branch makes it to a stable
> > > release we keep all components at the same version number like had been
> > > done for 1.7.x in the past?
> > >
> > > Having 1.8.x at three different version numbers is a pain to keep track
> > of
> > > packagingwise.
> >
> 
> >
> > Well, let me make a request to continue avoiding useless work for
> > packagers, since a version bump of a package without any content changes
> > just means additional work and useless rebuild without any additional gain.
> >
> > Having to bump for no reason is a pain packaingwise, how different
> > version numbers do make it harder for you is a secret to me, maybe you
> > will share it some day. ;-)
> >
> 
> 
> Also, packages from the same series (1.8.x) should just work independent of
> the minor version. Otherwise it is a sign that something is just badly
> broken.

correct.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.
Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience.  Start now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to