On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 02/10/14 11:20, Daniel Kolesa wrote: >> 2014-10-02 11:12 GMT+01:00 Daniel Zaoui <daniel.za...@samsung.com>: >>> Hi D5, >>> >>> Didn't we speak about having automatic tests to be sure it works as >>> expected? And don't tell me Lua checks it ;-) >>> >> >> I don't really think a test is necessary here, considering that whether it >> works or not is immediately visible from whether the generator creates a >> working output (for any eo file). If it didn't work, stuff wouldn't compile. > > > I strongly disagree. Covering all the functions, even the dead simple > ones like this, even if not important for testing the code is important > for the following three reasons:
You know that if it is executed during compilation stage it does account in our test coverage ? Just saying ;-) -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
