On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> >> wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be >>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be >>>> our final call. We do now have time to cleanup example and check that >>>> things look fine. >>> >>> Please correct me if I did not get you two correctly here. >>> >>> You both think we should release 1.19 only once the interface work is >>> fully done? Be it in 3 months or in a year? >> >> I hope that we will be done by November. > > > Hope dies last. :) > > More seriously. I have a hard time seeing that interfaces is fully done > in November when we still argue promises (as a very basic part) again. >
From what I remember, we decided promises will not take a key part in this. We will not rely on promises at this point. > The feedback I got so far is: make it a feature based release and only > release it when interfaces as a showstopper bug is done. > > I have my doubts this will fly, but if nobody else thinks this idea will > not work I stash my concerns and will see how I call help processing > this release. Just never ask me when this release will happen or point > out that distro or product schedules might need it done before XX :) > >> >>> Our track record for doing feature based releases is not really >>> promising to be honest. :) >> >> Ah ah ah. Well, to be honest, I have asked to get at least 2 releases >> cycle for efl interface work. We tried to stretch it to make that >> shorter, but that didn't fly. Now we are back to the original >> schedule, let's see if it is a bit more accurate. >> >>> This would need at least a detailed list with tasks which need to be >>> done before the release could happen. Plus a definition what done means >>> in the context of the task. >> >> I will try to make later this week an email about what needs to still >> be done for efl interface work. > > Looking forward to it. Maybe this gives some information we can base any > planning on. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
