On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Hacohen <t...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be >>>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be >>>>> our final call. We do now have time to cleanup example and check that >>>>> things look fine. >>>> >>>> Please correct me if I did not get you two correctly here. >>>> >>>> You both think we should release 1.19 only once the interface work is >>>> fully done? Be it in 3 months or in a year? >>> >>> I hope that we will be done by November. >> >> Hope dies last. :) >> >> More seriously. I have a hard time seeing that interfaces is fully done >> in November when we still argue promises (as a very basic part) again. > > From what I remember, we decided promises will not take a key part in > this. We will not rely on promises at this point.
It was requested to have an eo based promise to make decision. Also it was stated in that thread that there will not be any async request API (like file_set should be) if we do not have promise. This also include no MVC (We are not going back to insane complexity of handling it with events and having to maintain another insane hydra). -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
