improved but not ideal. what if we hint based on current x object domain, if they differ you can say that it's from a different thread... also hint on how to fix, maybe a wiki page that we show the link there.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Jean-Philippe ANDRÉ <j...@videolan.org> wrote: > jpeg pushed a commit to branch master. > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=c6dcf3dda448c422bd556834b336f7fdb9296097 > > commit c6dcf3dda448c422bd556834b336f7fdb9296097 > Author: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.an...@samsung.com> > Date: Mon Dec 5 09:46:55 2016 +0900 > > eo: Make error message less nebulous > > When writing this ERR log I thought about "thread" (it's really > the keyword here) but eventually reworded to "context". Let's be > clearer about the possible issue here. > --- > src/lib/eo/eo.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/eo/eo.c b/src/lib/eo/eo.c > index dd6cff6..37c2a4c 100644 > --- a/src/lib/eo/eo.c > +++ b/src/lib/eo/eo.c > @@ -1662,7 +1662,8 @@ err_obj: > err: > if (!data) return EINA_FALSE; > ERR("Object %p is not a valid object in this context: object domain: %d, " > - "current domain: %d, local domain: %d, available domains: [%s %s %s > %s]", > + "current domain: %d, local domain: %d, available domains: [%s %s %s > %s]." > + " Are you trying to access this object from another thread?", > eo_id, (int)domain, > (int)data->domain_stack[data->stack_top], (int)data->local_domain, > (data->tables[0]) ? "0" : " ", (data->tables[1]) ? "1" : " ", > > -- > > -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri -------------------------------------- Mobile: +55 (16) 99354-9890 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
