On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 14:45:26 +0200 Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> said:
> There is me as well but the setup is a bit too complex for me to say > lets go ahead and i can start. do you now know how it all is hooked up and works to even be able to consider changing it at this level? i mean there also is the option of "starting again from scratch" but regardless that's going to be a lot of pain as we can't lose our data (phab sql content and so on). > I think if need be this is something I could potentially help and maybe > get sorted upstream in the kernel. > > Is there anything in the logs that might be of interest for me to send > to the kernel mailing list? i don't know other than what i've posted before. > --- > Regards, > > Jonathan Aquilina > > On 2017-04-06 02:16, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 11:44:49 -0400 Daniel McLellan > > <daniel.mclel...@gmail.com> said: > > > >> sounds like you need better hosting > > > > it's a kernel bug in our own host kernel that hosts the vm's. enlightenment > > even owns the machine too. it's not a hardware or resource issue. it's a > > kernel bug in that host that doesnt seem to go away with upgrades. > > > > so likely we should look into moving stuff into containers instead to avoid > > it. but that's a huge amount of work and only one guy knows how things are > > set up to make it work... :( -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
