2017-06-30 1:37 GMT+02:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>:

> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:13:51 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me>
> said:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just to wrap this thread up following EDD:
> >
> > * no-one is proposing that we remove the ability to mark up text through
> > the markup format mechanism, it is a great feature
> > * we cannot make changes to this legacy API as apps depend on it or have
> > adapted to it
> >
> > * the new textblock API, which is currently plain text only is being
> > extended with a solid markup API
> > * The existing markup format will be supported through _markup_text_set
> or
> > similar API leaving text_set/get to be plain text only
> >
> > It was beileved that this would satisfy all requirements whilst removing
> > any confusion about the nature of text encoding when using plain text.
> > This allows us to take a path-of-least-surprise approach for the new Eo
> > based text APIs
>
> you have to have a markup version of everything. set, append, prepend,
> insert,
> replace etc.
>

or something like "markup_mode_enabled" that you can set on the widget to
enable/disable markup insert of text.


>
> > Thanks everyone for the discussion :)
> > Andy
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 at 05:39 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:55:14 +0200 Davide Andreoli <
> d...@gurumeditation.it
> > > >
> > > said:
> > >
> > > > 2017-06-19 13:36 GMT+02:00 Daniel Hirt <hirt.da...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Williams <
> > > a...@andywilliams.me>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Looking at the tests you point me at - selection (and the past)
> is a
> > > > plain
> > > > >> text copy with the markup stripped - exactly what I would expect
> for
> > > > >> text_get - but the current content transformed with the helper
> will
> > > not
> > > > get
> > > > >> you there - there is no built in interpretation of formatting -
> just
> > > > >> rendered understands it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > "elm_entry_selection_get" returns the text in markup format. The
> test
> > > > prints
> > > > > both types one after another (markup followed by plaintext) using
> > > > > "elm_entry_markup_to_utf8".
> > > > > It is essential for copy & paste of markup text between two entry
> > > clients,
> > > > > so the pasted formatting is kept.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> Overall the implementation feels wrong - supporting markup is
> great
> > > but
> > > > >> returning it inline in text_get feels like we are imposing
> internal
> > > > choices
> > > > >> on other devs.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I note that the code considers format but only when interacting
> with
> > > > files
> > > > >> - so I can have plain text files but not plain text input.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > Right, it's a feature so you can load plain files. You specify the
> > > format
> > > > > you
> > > > > want to load (plaintext or markup). But, after the file is loaded,
> it's
> > > > > discarded.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's important to point out that because there's an actual
> > > representation
> > > > > (markup), it's costly to store both plaintext and markup content
> in the
> > > > > object.
> > > > > Asking you to convert using "markup_to_utf8" is understandable, as
> it
> > > what
> > > > > we would actually do internally if we were to add API to get the
> text
> > > in
> > > > > plaintext. It's only one function call away, and it's easier than
> just
> > > add
> > > > > more
> > > > > API to the widget. No need for a new function if there's a way to
> do
> > > this
> > > > > already.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> Lastly the documentation clearly discussed markup capability but
> it
> > > > *never*
> > > > >> discusses encoding and there is no explicit mention that your text
> > > will
> > > > be
> > > > >> transformed after text_set. If it were then it should be
> symmetrically
> > > > >> transformed back on text_get - path of least surprise.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > Actually, it is not transformed on "text_set". You are expected to
> > > enter a
> > > > > markup-compatible text. Otherwise you will have the mentioned
> special
> > > > > characters (like "<") misinterpreted as markup. You can try with
> > > > > "elm_object_text_set" on an entry widget.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> I don't quite understand why we would build formatting in as
> > > mandatory,
> > > > >> functionality is great but it should be possible to turn it off.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I agree that people complain when markup is not supported in a
> widget
> > > but
> > > > >> that is the expectation we have set - consistency is very
> important
> > > > indeed
> > > > >> and I think we don't have it in this regard.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Additionally I think the markup_to_utf8 methods are peculiarly
> named -
> > > > they
> > > > >> do no character encoding so the usage of utf8 is probably
> incorrect...
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > They're correct. UTF-8 is the standard plaintext encoding. We
> support
> > > > UTF-8,
> > > > > and provide converters for your convenience. You probably won't
> need
> > > those
> > > > > most
> > > > > of the time.
> > > > > Your plaintext is always "encoded", but you probably won't notice
> that
> > > > > because
> > > > > it's backward-compatible with US ASCII (1-byte per character).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Andrew
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > Lastly, I would like to mention "Efl.Ui.Text" - this new widget is
> a
> > > part
> > > > > of a
> > > > > rework of the Textblock object. It's in BETA stage.
> > > > > It does what you require: all text input is expected to be
> plaintext.
> > > > > There's no
> > > > > "markup" logic in it. Instead, you format your text by setting
> ranges
> > > and
> > > > > calling
> > > > > functions to apply formatting. Again, markup does not exist in this
> > > > object,
> > > >
> > > > What? no more markup support? This is really, really sad to hear :(
> > >
> > > i've ben trying to tell people that markup is LESS bad than no markup
> (or
> > > having to do it via api calls)... but the people giving the opinions on
> > > this
> > > aren't writing the apps.
> > >
> > > maybe you c an convince them.
> > >
> > > > I'm using markup everywhere in my media center and I'm really happy
> with
> > > > it's usage.
> > >
> > > too bad. plain text for you unless you call lots of api calls to
> insert it
> > > tag
> > > by tag. have fun.
> > >
> > > > Please think carefully at my use case:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-594d67c3ee4752.10999768.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Look at the the textblock in the lower-right corner,
> > > > the code to set the text is something like this:
> > > >
> > > > text = sprintf("<title>%s</> <small>%s</small><br>"
> > > >        "<small><name>%s</> %s <name>/ %s %s</><br>"
> > > >        "<views>%s %s</> <name>/</> "
> > > >        "<likes>%s %s</> <name>/</> "
> > > >        "<comments>%s %s</></small><br>%s",
> > > >        video.name, video.duration,
> > > >        _('user'), video.user,
> > > >        _('uploaded'), relative_date(video.created_time),
> > > >        views, ngettext('view', 'views', views),
> > > >        likes, ngettext('like', 'likes', likes),
> > > >        comments, ngettext('comment', 'comments', comments),
> > > >        video.description)
> > > >
> > > > ..thats it, and I have those beautiful (theme-able!) formatted text.
> > > >
> > > > Now try to think at the code needed to do the same with the "new"
> API !!
> > > >
> > > > Another insurmountable problem of the API approach: the text in my
> > > example
> > > > comes from plugins (the vimeo plugin in this case) that are separate
> > > > processes
> > > > from the core mediacenter, plugins just fetch datas from the net and
> pass
> > > > them back to the core. This means that the plugins do not have
> access to
> > > the
> > > > textblock API.
> > > >
> > > > Some more examples:
> > > > https://github.com/DaveMDS/epymc/wiki/Screenshots
> > > >
> > > > I can understand the initial issue Andrew was speaking in this thread
> > > > (text_get
> > > > is difficult to use). And I agree that the default behavior should be
> > > plain
> > > > text set/get,
> > > > BUT: we really need to implement something like: text_markup_set(...)
> > > >
> > > > To be more clear: loosing the markup ability (in textblock, buttons,
> and
> > > > any other widget) is a shame, we are loosing IMO the most powerful
> and
> > > > useful
> > > > feature of textblock in efl.
> > > >
> > > > > can be re-added as a module in later stages.
> > > >
> > > > Please, please, please re-added it now, otherwise I will not be able
> to
> > > > port my
> > > > applications to the new API, until a "later stage" will eventually
> occur.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > You can check its current state in "efl ui text" test in
> > > elementary_test.
> > > > > Feedback
> > > > > will be very much appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this answers a few of your questions.
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > --
> > > > > Danny (herdsman) Hirt
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
> --------------
> > > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > >
> > --
> > http://andywilliams.me
> > http://ajwillia.ms
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to