On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:21 PM Pierre Couderc <pie...@couderc.eu> wrote:
> > > On 07/26/2017 05:19 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > I second raster here. > > > > ... > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: > >> > >> i like the simplicity of our model... > Well, maybe the point is not master branch. > > The point maybe : will e remain an experimental fine tool (I was about > to write "fine toy") or is it to be used by "normal" users ? > I expect to be a "normal" user... > If it is to be used, some stability is needed. This supposes to freeze > master branch at some point creating a release branch. And to backport > only very critical bugs from master to the release. > This is not the case today. > > > There are multiple release branches, the latest of which receives backports for bug fixes only: see https://git.enlightenment.org/core/enlightenment.git/refs/ for any branch with the format 'enlightenment-0.XX'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
