On 28/07/17 16:30, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > Reading my mails from yesterday again I think one might be able to get > the impression I actually want to shoot this idea down before it > actually has a chance to proof itself. That is not what I wanted to > bring across. :) > > I'm actually very much interested to get the workflow improved if there > is a significant improvement that comes with it. As you can see from all > these questions in my mails I have a lot of doubts that it would improve > the situation. Maybe I just need to get educated. Hard to say. :) > > Another thing is that I am _very_ reluctant to try such a big change in > efl first. If people want to move on with this we would need to see some > examples in smaller community projects here to get a first idea.
I suspect the only problem here could be that most of the other projects in the community either A) don't have enough people contributing or B) don't release regularly enough for this approach to make as much sense. I certainly think its overkill for a project with 1-2 main authors and only semi regular releases, at that scale its much easier to keep feature branches up to date should you decide they won't make the next release etc. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
