On , Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
> Edward,
>
> sorry for
taking so long to reply, but see below:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at
3:12 PM, Edward Mann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 23.11.2012
10:42, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
>>
>>> Edward,
>>> which spec
are you using to build? I haven't dealt with Fedora packages for quite
some time, but it seems that that file is being installed by make
install but is not being packaged anywhere.
>>> Your change just
disabled the gl_x11 engine, but the right way out would be to point the
install section to package that file.
>>> Ping me on irc ('lfelipe')
and I can try to help you out.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Luis Felipe
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Edward Mann <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> When i am building Evas i have an problem and get this
error
>>>>
>>>> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>>>>
/usr/lib64/evas/modules/engines/gl_x11/linux-gnu-x86_64-1.7.2/module.so
>>>>
>>>> I just edit the spec file and move
>>>>
>>>> %bcond_with
module_engine_gl_x11
>>>>
>>>> into the
>>>>
>>>> %bcond_without
module_engine_gl_x11
>>>>
>>>> and it will build. I don't set any
special flags, so is this expected behavior?
>>> --
>>>
>>> Luís
Felipe Strano Moraes
>>> http://www.strano.org [1]
>>
>> I did not see
you in IRC. If the message at the top of the evas.spec file is correct,
what i did was enabled the packaging of gl_x11.
>>
>> # Conditional
build stuff; from rpm 4.4 /usr/lib/rpm/macros.
>> # bcond_without
defaults to WITH, and vice versa. Yes, it's
>> # ass-backward. Blame
PLD.
>
> Yes, you're correct.
>
>> i just untar the evas release and
edit the evas.spec file that is present.
>>
>> I then tar evas-1.7.2
back up and run rpmbuild -ta evas-1.7.2.tar.gz and it works.
>>
>> I
have had to make this change for a while, so i want to know if i am
building the package wrong.
>
> You're not building the package wrong,
what is incorrect is in fact the spec file. I've setup a Fedora VM here
and will be updating the spec files accordingly, but basically the spec
file had the gl_x11 engine disabled by default, but the argument it was
giving configure to disable it does not exist.
>
> configure: WARNING:
unrecognized options: --enable-image-saver-eet,
--enable-image-saver-jpeg, --enable-image-saver-png,
--enable-image-saver-tiff, --disable-image-saver-edb, --disable-gl-x11,
--disable-sdl
>
> Configure was then autodetecting the gl_x11 engine
to be built, but the proper installation sections were ifdef'd out.
>
> I'll be going over all the specs soon in order to check other legacy
options there and will try to update them accordingly during this week,
if you've any other feedback that would sure be helpful.
>
> Best
regards,
> Luis Felipe
>
> --
> Luís Felipe Strano Moraes
>
http://www.strano.org [1]
I noticed this warning in other builds as
well. I was planning on getting into each spec.in file that was showing
that error and fixing them. If so do you want me to send you a diff, or
do you just want me to wait for you to fix them?
Thanks
Links:
------
[1] http://www.strano.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Enlightenment-release mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-release
