On 11/09/04, at 12:49 +0200, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Didier Casse wrote: > > On 08/09/04, at 20:40 -0400, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Kim Woelders wrote: > >> > >>>Geoffrey wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Seems that the slide methods for windows does not function at all for > >>>>me. I've tried them all and see no effect. Is this a known problem, > >>>>or am I possibly missing something? > >>>> > >>>>Previously I have had success with box as well as a semi transparent > >>>>slide setting. I don't recall now, but I guess the semi-transparent > >>>>would be technical? > >>>> > >>> > >>>It actually all works, except that the window sliding code wasn't > >>>written to handle the CPU/graphics speed of computers today. The result > >>>is that a minimum per iteration slide distance kicks in which makes the > >>>slide time so short that you don't really see the effect. > >> > >>Ah, I see, or I don't see. :) Thanks for the update. Any plans to > >>address this? > > > > > > Yeah it's kind of a nice effect which was still present in > > enlightenment-0.16.6. Is there any way to see this stuff?:-( > > > The various sliding effects should be fixed in CVS now. > I'd appreciate feedback on whether or not it works now.
i pulled out e16 from cvs compiled... and it still doesn't work on my system. :-( With kind regards, Didier. --- Didier F.B Casse | PhD student | Singapore Synchrotron light Source (SSLS) Email: didierbe AT sps dot nus dot sg | Web: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg GPG Key 1024D/B3C57D01 2004-06-23 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
