On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:46:08 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:29:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> said: >> > >> > ok. looking here the problme is.. you have a schedule.. that has none of >> > the >> > following: >> > >> > a knowledge of how long tasks will take >> > people available to do the tasks >> > time guaranteed from all the people >> > >> > this schedule doesn't account for any of that. the result will be a date >> > rolls around with none of the stuff done for it. >> > >> > i propose something MUCH simpler. if the aim is stability in stages maybe >> > simply call freeze dates. >> > >> > "you have until 30th april to finish your current work, if it's underway. >> > anything not done by then must be disabled/removed/unpatched. work can >> > happen as long as it is compile-time enabled or runtime enabled and has no >> > effect unless enabled". >> > >> > then within a few days of that date tarballs are produced with incremented >> > release numbers. >> > >> > how about that? :) >> >> well, maybe i'm too bad at explaining stuff, but my suggestion was >> exactly that. I don't want to block developers, that's why it is a > > well.. you did have a detailed release schedule on the wiki even a "e17 alpha > - > everything done" date :)
well, people asking for it! they even complained i make it sooooo far away ;-) >> weekend. But it would be good to ask developers to help test and fix >> bugs whenever possible. And I tried to put dates that would not bring >> problems with GSoC since most developers are also mentors or students, >> and also because it's good to know beforehand when it will happen. > > sure. > >> I already have my schedule in Google Calendar, I plan to mail the list >> on Monday with a warning about freeze on Thursday, then one on >> Thursday and then another on Sunday. Let's see how it goes. > > i would suggest much longer timeframes myself eg " april 30" then 1 weeks to > verify everyrthing is stable and fix last minute things, april 7 - snap > (announce a known svnrev that is with this snap - make dist the tarballs and > upload). then next one may 30... and so on. well, I did it small to try to not impact people (mostly you) so much, if you think it will not, then fine just change the schedule. The bad thing is that I need to go through my calendar and reschedule all the events :-P -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
