IANAL but AFAIU during runtime the resulting license is LGPL. The code
itself is not relicensed

On May 13, 2011 10:04 PM, "Carsten Haitzler" <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:

On Fri, 13 May 2011 15:47:20 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:

> On Fr...
well not really. evas doesn't become lgpl because it links to an lgpl lib :)
but the point is still right - apps are unaffected by license of external
generic loaders, so we can expand the # of formats evas can load in the
"gpl"
direction AND in the "it's complex and/or unstable" direction (html,
ppt/doc/xls etc. loaders and so on). it basically makes it all possible (but
as
you noted - there is a cost).


> General Users = safety, if any of these loaders crash or hung, the main
> program/process will no...
actually... hanging can be a problem as evas opens a pipe and waits on
blocking
input. it has no timeout, so if it hangs, evas using process will too. you
can
just kill the external loader process pid and the app will unhang (and then
load fails) - so its recoverable, and probably a sign to uninstall that
specific external loader and file a bug. :)


> Problems: this is not as fast as a native loader, so we'll not move every
> (if any!) loader to b...
yeah. that's its major Achilles heel. it has a speed and overhead penalty.


>
> --
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
> --------------------...
--

------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Hait...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to