On 16-12-04 10:06, Christopher Barry wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 14:48:54 +0100
> First name Last name <dex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 2:36 PM, First name Last name
> ><dex...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Don't mind this part of the message, killing every instance of
> >terminology would reload the settings and mute the sounds (I have
> >enabled "Multiple instances, one process").
> >
>
> Curious, why do you prefer multiple instances of a terminal under a
> single process? What is the benefit?
>
> I'm assuming that you realize that if something running in one of the
> instances gets hung hard, all other terminal instances also get hung
> even if their shells/programs are functioning fine.
>
> lxterminal started using this behavior by default a while back. Very
> annoying. It was one of the main reasons I switched to Terminology (but
> now I love it for lots of other reasons).
>
> It just seems like a 'Really Bad Idea' (tm) for a terminal to act this
> way to me. What am I missing here?
Reduced memory usage.
--
Boris Faure
Pointer Arithmetician
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
