As 'luck' would have it, the switch with the incorrect duplicate engineID failed this morning anyway so will have to be swapped out. Co-incidence?
Half of the switch failed - port 1-24 aren't lit. Have had to RMA a few switches over the years with the same problem. N. -----Original Message----- From: Nick Allen Sent: 12 May 2010 09:59 To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List Subject: RE: [enterasys] Duplicate EngineID Hi Jason - no luck with that: TEQLON-sw02(su)->show snmp engineid EngineId: 80:00:15:f8:03:00:11:88:97:89:58:00 Engine Boots = 5 Engine Time = 31176 Max Msg Size = 2048 TEQLON-sw02(su)->set spantree mstcfgid cfgname 'guest' TEQLON-sw02(su)->show snmp engineid EngineId: 80:00:15:f8:03:00:11:88:97:89:58:00 Engine Boots = 5 Engine Time = 31238 Max Msg Size = 2048 TEQLON-sw02(su)-> N. -----Original Message----- From: Parker, Jason [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 12 May 2010 02:47 To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List Subject: RE: [enterasys] Duplicate EngineID All, The MAC address in this command spantree mstcfgid cfgname '00-11-88-97-89-58'is the next unit in the stack that will become manager I always change this command to spantree mstcfgid cfgname 'guest' Please try this and then check the engine ID Thank you Jason -----Original Message----- From: Nick Allen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:25 PM To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List Subject: RE: [enterasys] Duplicate EngineID Thanks Zoltan, No the MAC addresses are different, but engineIDs are the same. WhitSt C2 1st Floor(su)->show snmp engineid EngineId: 80:00:15:f8:03:00:11:88:97:89:58:00 Engine Boots = 24 Engine Time = 642 Max Msg Size = 2048 WhitSt C2 1st Floor(su)-> TEQLON-sw02(su)->show snmp engineid EngineId: 80:00:15:f8:03:00:11:88:97:89:58:00 Engine Boots = 4 Engine Time = 28684 Max Msg Size = 2048 TEQLON-sw02(su)-> What did look somewhat relevant though was that I found a rogue line of config on the "WhitSt C2 1st Floor" switch: spantree mstcfgid cfgname '00-11-88-97-89-58' Not sure who put that in there or why but that name seems to relate to the mac address of the other switch and I was hoping the engineID might be based on that. I removed that line and rebooted that switch, but it's made no difference. Any last ideas before I open a support call? It's not urgent. Thanks, N. This e-mail is intended only for the named person or entity to which it is addressed and contains valuable business information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error via e-mail to [email protected] and please delete the e-mail from your system, retaining no copies in any media. We appreciate your cooperation. -----Original Message----- From: Zoltan Ori [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tue 5/11/2010 9:22 PM To: Enterasys Customer Mailing List Subject: Re: [enterasys] Duplicate EngineID AFAIK the engine ID is partly formed from the MAC address of the switch. Do the switches have the same MAC address? Zoltan On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:09, you wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to have two C-series switches with duplicate engineID's - is > there a way to get a switch to generate a new one? > > N. --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected] --- To unsubscribe from enterasys, send email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe enterasys [email protected]
