Mandi! Mike Kaply In chel di` si favelave... > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/understanding-depth-profile-installation
As Thane say, i'm also a bit puzzled by that explanation. What i understand is that, because profile dir name are hashad against install dir path, i'll get different profiles for different bitness. This can be horrible for FF, disastrous for TB. Also, as Klaus say, i think that approach would be more 'safe', eg 'use hashed profile dirs only for non-standard install dirs' (that probably was the 'developer' approach). Generally speaking, having different profiles for different FF/TB version is a good idea, but the migration within profiles have to be clear and rock-solid, cannot leave users with empty profiles... and cannot leave behind them too much unused profiles: we use roming profiles here! So, seems to me that there's no alternatives on setting MOZ_LEGACY_PROFILES=1, for now, here... hoping that a policy can be used for that sooner. Thanks, Mike. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN) marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797 Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA! http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000 (cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA) _______________________________________________ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
