On 2001-03-31 04:59, "Bryan Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Out of curiosity, is there any reason to use OS X's address book over
> 'rage's PIM? It's pretty anemic as to the number of fields... I'd hate to
> see the 'rage team drop the 'rage address book for that thing.
>
> But stranger things have happened.
>
> - B
>
I don't know this for sure, but I think Apple's Address book is "extensible"
(sp?). I really hope so (= wishful thinking?), because I would love to see a
central contact depository on which different applications (mail, fax, PIM)
could build. This was one of the things I really loved about the PowerTalk
concept. Anybody else remember this?
I really hate the duplication and unavoidable mistakes all these separate
contact databases bring with them.
Gus
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
