Title: Re: Junk Mail Filter in O'04
On 5/16/04 9:27 AM, "Paul Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No. Spammers can pretty quickly work around a lot of the "learning" of Bayesian filters. That's why you're seeing lost of plain text spam that includes long paragraphs of long Latinate words - they often get around filters which have learned to allow messages with some of these words. Instead, MS plan to update the filter from time to time. They're using the same Junk filter engines as Outlook, MSN and other MS programs - which gives them a HUGE sample to practice on  and learn from - much more than you could ever do with your own little Bayesian checker.

Very interesting, and very good to learn as well. Filter updates – what a great idea. So there’s no big advantage to marking a message as “junk email” as opposed to deleting it, unless you are collecting junk mail for a corpus for a Bayesian filter or some such thing.
--
Bruce
____________________________________________________
B R U C E  K.   klutch-at-erols.com

Reply via email to