on 8/17/04 3:42 PM, Lindsley Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, both you and Paul dislike my idea. But, I don't see that this > suggestion is any form of censorship, more akin to replying from the wrong > email realm and being rejected as a non-subscriber. I've done the latter, > get the message, adjust my settings and fire it off, again. > > There have been several null subject posts lately, and digest isn't much > better. > > I still would like to see my idea tossed around.
While I don't like the idea of bouncing if subjects are empty or contain a digest heading, this does inspire a question, is there any way in E-rage 2004 to thread based in message-id rather than subject? I know many people hijack a thread and just change the subject, but I am on some lists where they do not, but subjects do get changed at times, some mailers use re: and some let you define it. In the case where one can define the re: attribute, the threading gets messed up. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Haneda Tel: 415.898.2602 http://www.newgeo.com Fax: 313.557.5052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novato, CA U.S.A. -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
