To me, the tree behind the fallen branch looks like ordinatry Gray Birch, which 
I usually call white birch.
Did you mention Arrowwood? We have that here.
Barry

--- On Sat, 4/4/09, JennyNYC <[email protected]> wrote:

From: JennyNYC <[email protected]>
Subject: [ENTS] Re: Tree ID Help
To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, April 4, 2009, 10:53 AM

HI,

Which tree are we talking about? The one behind your river birch
fallen branch? Amazing.

With the hophornbeam - euro or amer./birch. I'll have to get to see
the buds and scratch the twigs (do river birch twigs have a fragrance
like b. lenta?)

Need some help with arrowood id. Do you have any? I wonder if we have
any amelanchier in NYC forests. Too many species here!!! I think I
will have  a nervous breakdown when I finally go to the Appalachians.

Jenny



On Apr 4, 12:59 pm, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Will-
>
> Yes, it could be a mazzard also--I think both P. padus and avium are
> naturalized in my area.
>
> Steve
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Will Blozan
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >  Steve,
>
> > Prunus avium?
>
> > Will F. Blozan
>
> > President, Eastern Native Tree Society
>
> > President, Appalachian Arborists, Inc.
> >   ------------------------------
>
> > *From:* [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On
> > Behalf Of *Steve Galehouse
> > *Sent:* Friday, April 03, 2009 4:35 PM
> > *To:* [email protected]
> > *Subject:* [ENTS] Re: Tree ID Help
>
> > Jenny-
>
> > The new photos are not river birch; probably cherry birch as you
suggest,
> > but could also be of European alder. I've attached a photo of
cherry birch
> > taken locally, and will go get a photo of river birch for you to
compare.
>
> >  Steve
>
> >  On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:10 PM, JennyNYC
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Steve,
>
> > You're way ahead of me with branching patterns, but I don't
know if
> > Betula nigra bark would flake in that way. Wouldn't you be able
to see
> > a trace of the horizontal lenticels? Also, the tree may not be
growing
> > straight because of soil erosion. It's on a bit of an incline -
which
> > I didn't show very well since I didn't get the base of the
trunk.
>
> > I added 3 pictures of the guy next door which I think is a big (to my
> > inexperienced eyes!) Betula lenta. Can you tell from the photo? It
> > could certainly be a river birch, though.
>
> >http://picasaweb.google.com/JennifDudley/TreeIDHelp?feat=directlink
>
> > Jenny
>
> > On Apr 3, 3:44 pm, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > > Jenny-
>
> > > After looking at your other photos more carefully--not focusing
on the
> > > bark--I think the tree in your photo is a river birch, Betula
nigra. The
> > > reasons I think it's not a hophornbeam are:
>
> > > 1-The branch attachment to the trunk. The tree in your photos
displays
> > sort
> > > of a "saddle" at the point of attachment, which is a
characteristic of
> > > birches but not of Ostrya. Compare the attached photo to your
photo #4.
>
> > > 2-Ostrya tends to be very vertical, straight, and
single-stemmed; the
> > > general habit of your tree is arching and leaning, with a couple
of main
> > > stems.
>
> > > Both species are found in similar habitats where native. River
birch
> > > approaches its northern native limit in the NYC area(as it does
here in
> > NE
> > > Ohio), and the northern river birches look very different from
the
> > popular
> > > cultivars such as Heritage birch and Dura-heat birch, both of
which have
> > > much lighter and more exfoliating bark. Either species can
retain a few
> > > shriveled leaves over the winter.
>
> > > Steve
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:48 AM, JennyNYC
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks! It sounds unanimous. Please send on any pix of
hophornbeam.
> > > > Looking forward to one from Cleveland, Steve.
>
> > > > Jenny.
>
> > > > On Apr 3, 8:05 am, William Morse <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > > > > i agree as well. those 'not typical' traits
you've pointed out are
> > all
> > > > > still within the variation found in the species.
>
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Will Fell
<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Looks like a hop-hornbeam to me also. I've
seen a some with flaky
> > bark
> > > > > > and some with tighter bark, but the leaves
hanging on is not
> > unusual
> > > > > > for it.
>
> > > > > > On Apr 2, 11:29 pm, Steve Galehouse
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> Jenny-
>
> > > > > >> It looks sort of like hop-hornbeam, but not
typical for the way it
> > > > looks in
> > > > > >> my area--the smaller trunk is more similar to
what I've seen, the
> > > > larger
> > > > > >> more "flaky" (but hey, you're
in NYC)! Tomorrow I'll take a pic
> > and
> > > > send on
> > > > > >> to you what i think is typical(for
Cleveland).
>
> > > > > >> Steve
>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:13 PM, JennyNYC
<[email protected]
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > >> > ENTS,
>
> > > > > >> > Can you help me identify this tree? I am
thinking it's a
> > hophornbeam
> > > > > >> > (Ostrya virginiana), but do their leaves
cling in winter?  It's
> > > > > >> > growing just above the Bronx River flood
plain. I couldn't get a
> > > > close
> > > > > >> > look at the buds.
>
> >http://picasaweb.google.com/JennifDudley/TreeIDHelp?feat=directlink
>
> > > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > > >> > Jenny- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >  Ostrya branching habit.jpg
> > > 189KViewDownload


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to