Ken Lin wrote:
>
> > Now we need to know if there is a
> > commercial intent behind those posts. Does he contribute to
> > lists/groups during or after working hours? If during working
> > hours then it has to be with his employer's consent. If his
> > employer agrees to it, it has to be because he sees a commercial
> > gain in it. As simple as that.
> >
>
> This is a SURE way of driving an individual right off this list who is
> exteremely knowledgable and has been so very much helpful in his inputs to
> this list....., we don't want that to happen now, do we?
To set things straight, I have no agenda to get anyone off
this/any list. I just think that Brad was raising some valid
questions. It is only fair to discuss those questions especially
in the light of what happened to Paul. Commercial or not
commercial is the question. To my knowledge, Paul was
contributing on topic, displayed some knowledge and might have
been helpful to some. Still, he got blasted for his sig. The
degree of one's knowledge/usefulness/kindness etc. should not be
the criteria by which one determines if contributions have
something commercial to them or not. It is not necessarily
related.
Maybe Henry could clarify?
Jean-Marc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
