> Peter K wrote
> ...
> >John is quoting from Canon's poor PR. He is also an avid Nikon user and
> >supported in part by Nikon so it would not be approriate to speak well of a
> >competitors product.
>
...
> have gone with Nikon. I can also forgive someone for operating equipment in
> accordance with manufactorer instructions and stating the limitations of
> this presents.
>
>
The significant issue is that this article appears to have been written before
the
release of the 4 IS super-teles which are tripod compatible. I do wonder how
well his tripod works when he is in a vehicle where the engine has to be kept
running in case it has to make a quick getaway though - I'd imagine the
100-400 IS would be perfect for that situation.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
