----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Is that it?!?
> From: Bill Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello Bill
>
> > It looks like it was Daniel Rocca again, if one follows the link. Please
>
> Yes, it's me Daniel Rocha (not with 2 "c" but "ch") :)
>
> > note that the 70-200 IS news is incorrect, it was quickly changed to news
> > of a more weatherproofed 70-200 f/2.8 L, but not with IS.
>
> There is a confusion here !
>
> Your are refering to a news from the 12/12/00 which said that a 70-200 2,8
> sealed have replaced the old version.
>
> But the actual news from the 08 february 2001, is a complete new
> information, which comes with the infos about the 2 news TCs from the _same_
> source ! I hope that the 70-200 2,8L IS USM will be annonced at the PMA, but
> of course I can't bet on it ! :(((
I hope your source is right...and tells us more EOS news also in the future
Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pitkajarvi.net
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
