On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 21:10:23 +0100, you wrote:
>(actually, they even *can* be relatively crap, since digital is less
>demanding in resolution....;))
>
Why is that? Aren't the optics still a, if not "the", major factor
in image quality? I'm asking in a spirit of curiosity, not challenge!
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
