Perhaps Canon can make it a fixed f/4.0 like they did
with the 70-200 f/4.0L.  That should keep the price
down - somewhat....

Jack

--- Chip Louie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> <<SNIPPED>
> >
> > If Canon is listening, I for one would like a pro
> > version of the 28-105 - perhaps it could have a
> good
> > seal against dust and the elements, a fixed f3.5
> (f2.8
> > would be nicer of course) and a harder wearing
> body
> > and lens extension mechanisms.
> >
> > Jack
> 
> 
> Hi Jack,
> 
> When Canon brings out an EF 28-105 2.8L I'll be
> first in line as long as the
> street price is not over $1,500USD.  IMO $1,500USD
> would be reasonable
> (YIKES!), for a pro class built 4:1 zoom ratio f/2.8
> ring USM lens built
> like the EF 70-200 2.8L!  Make it fixed length and
> totally sealed like the
> EF 70-200 2.8L but NOT IS!
> 
> 
> Cheers/Chip
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to