> > > > <<SNIPPED> > > > > > > If Canon is listening, I for one would like a pro > > > version of the 28-105 - perhaps it could have a > > good > > > seal against dust and the elements, a fixed f3.5 > > (f2.8 > > > would be nicer of course) and a harder wearing > > body > > > and lens extension mechanisms. > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > Hi Jack, > > > > When Canon brings out an EF 28-105 2.8L I'll be > > first in line as long as the > > street price is not over $1,500USD. IMO $1,500USD > > would be reasonable > > (YIKES!), for a pro class built 4:1 zoom ratio f/2.8 > > ring USM lens built > > like the EF 70-200 2.8L! Make it fixed length and > > totally sealed like the > > EF 70-200 2.8L but NOT IS! > > > > > > Cheers/Chip
> > Perhaps Canon can make it a fixed f/4.0 like they did > with the 70-200 f/4.0L. That should keep the price > down - somewhat.... > > Jack Hi Jack, I want a replacement for my 28-70 2.8L, I want to keep the lens speed and add more focal length at the long end. Who cares about the price, as long as it's in line with the other lenses in this family an f/2.8 28-105 non-IS should see a street price of about $1,200-$1,400USD and this is fine by me! Cheers/Chip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
