[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I recently purchased a 28-70 F2.8L and a 70-200F2.8L to go on my EOS 3
>
> At the time, the sales guy suggested purchasing protective filters for both.
> Not being sure I ended up purchasing a Canon "protect" filter and switch it
> depending on which lens I am using.
>
> I accept the need for protection for the front of the lens but do not
> understand the difference between a protect, a skylight and a UV filter
>
> On brands, the sales guy suggested not buying Canon but going for B+W.
> These were more expensive so I was suspicious. Was I right to be?
>
> Mostly I photograph wildlife and use Fuji Velvia and Provia films almost
> exclusively.
>
> Opinions gratefully received.
>
> Rod
The use of filters to protect your lens is almost like Canon vs Nikon,
Ford vs Chevy, Icom vs Kenwood, etc etc. Some use them religiously,
others don't.
Suggesting B+W over Canon filters was not a ploy to get you to spend
more money. B+W, and I believe Heliopan, are the only filters with
brass instead of aluminum. This reduces the possibility of the metal of
the filter seizing with the front of your lens. The glass of the B+W is
made better, as in coatings, etc.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organized people are just too lazy to look for things.
All outgoing messages scanned by Norton Anti Virus.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
