I've got what I think is a basic grasp of the differences between the 1n and the 3.
The 3 is lighter and newer and I assume some things will reflect its relative newness, like faster af and the multiple focusing points. While I like the solid and heavy pro style cameras, and while I think the weight may help a bit with slow handheld shots in low light, I also like lighter zippier cameras too. I don't bash equipment around and I don't use it in war zones or dangerous environments so strictly speaking I don't NEED a pro type body, but I find that they tend to be designed in a way I like with more emphasis on simplicity. But I also don't need the ultimate in af speed- I don't shoot sports or rapidly moving peope or pbjects most of the time. But there is still something rather nice about having a fast and responsive af system anyway. The only special needs I have re focusing would be the ability to autofocus reliably in poor light, or backlit conditions. Similarly a metering system that works well in low light is a good thing for me- I mean sensitivity rather than the ability to handle seriously backlit scenes- I wouldn't rely on matrix type metering there. Eye-controlled focusing is not be a s ignificant factor for me either way. Loudness might be a consideration if there is a difference. Can anyone who has used both the 1n and the 3 give me any more information or impressions on which to base my choice? Or personal observations/irrational preferences/anything to give me a better idea of the difference? And- can I set the 3 so that one press of a button somewhere will lock the exposure and another press unlock it? I rather like that feature and AFAIK the 1n doesn't do this. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
