Jim Davis Nature Photography wrote: > Peter, you're darned tooting I'm doubting many things I read and see > on the net. There could be many explanations why he saw these effects > on a small sensor. One might be that his Nikkor lens was flawed. I > have never noticed any fringing on my 10d which has about the same > sized sensor.
First, te Nikokr lens was not flawed. Second you don't own the Tamron so why would you look for this? > If the Nikon Dslr shows this, then nya nya for Canon. I have seen > these effects from a 1Ds, as shown on Luminous Landscape. I have seen > a software solution as well. > > Once again, because you have seen someone's results with one > particular body and lens, do not assume that some kind of theory is > valid. We need a bit more data on this to jump to such conclusions > right now. > > I'm sure both Canon and Nikon are working on the problem, meanwhile > millions go about shooting with their 'flawed' Dslrs. You are putting words in my mouth and that is wrong. I never said the DSLRs were flawed. I did not say I theorized all from one test simply pointed out what was seen and that the Tamron proved to be a very good lens for digital. Your "nya nya" comment is childish and at this point I see a need to terminate this thread or at least my responses to it. Please believe what you like, especially if it makes you feel better. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
